Online Casinos News

A bill that would have shepherd in the largest gambling expansion in Florida history was withdrawn by its legislative sponsor on Friday, killing for now the vision of allowing up to three mega-resort casinos in the Miami and Fort Lauderdale area.

The bill, which proponents said could lead to 100,000 new jobs for the state, faced a likely defeat at its first stop – the House Business and Consumer Affairs Subcommittee. Its sponsor, Miami Republican Representative Erik Fresen, asked that the bill be reserved from deliberation by the panel at its last planned session of the year.

Rules in the Florida House of Representatives prohibit the chamber from taking further action on a bill that has failed to pass at least one group, so the measure is dead for 2012, House Rules Chairman Gary Aubuchon said after the meeting adjourned.

Today’s action on the Casino gambling bill is a resounding victory for those of us who have opposed this assault on Florida’s family-friendly economy,Aubuchon said. Florida has been hard-hit by the housing crash and its redundancy rate, while declining, is still well above average at 9.9 percent.

The Legislature is under pressure to fill a $1 billion revenue gap, but lawmakers disagree whether casinos would bring in new money or cannibalize existing tourism revenues. The proposal would have created a state gaming commission to license up to three southeast Florida casinos whose owners invest at least $2 billion apiece in resort complexes.

Successful applicants would have paid a $50 million one-time license fee, with an annual renewal fee of $2 million. They would also have been subject to a 10 percent tax on gross gambling revenues.

Florida law now bars casinos from increasing beyond those operated by the Seminole Indian tribe and selected pari-mutuel racetracks and jai alai courts known as racinos.The Senate version of the proposal, which passed its first committee stop but faced resistance, would have allowed the pari-mutuels to function full-fledged casino games at the same tax rates levied against the larger resort casinos.

Gambling giants such as the Las Vegas Sands Corp had urged lawmakers to allow full casino gambling at so-called destination resorts in Florida since the Seminoles won their right to offer blackjack, baccarat and other banked card games more than two years ago.

For Casino games,casinos list, Casino Guide, gambling games, casino cartoons etc…………….more details visit bestcasinosreview.com

South Carolina’s love-hate relationship with gambling is title for another round of well loving and hating, in the state legislature and elsewhere. At issue are plans for Native American-sponsored casinos at two probable locales. Members of the Cherokee Nation are proposing to build a Casino near Hardeeville on land not yet acquire, but if they are winning the track will become a condition thanks to a loophole in federal Indian law.

A group of Catawba Indians are looking at building a casino in York County, on land the tribe already owns. The first shovelful of dirt is years from being moved, but already some S.C. backs are bowed. Governor Nikki Haley has vowed to veto any enabling legislation for a casino, and religious and moral leaders are decrying the plans as an assault on customary values.

Not a lot of good can be said about gambling in any form, and while most of it is probably harmless for most people, it can be addictive for others. That addiction, like all addictions, can be positively ruinous. It is also true that gambling does not spawn a lot of healthy activity on the side. The proposed Hardeeville casino is billed, in its current iteration, as a “resort,” complete with fancy hotel and golf course; however, it is hard to imagine a casino without some more tawdry accompaniments nearby.

The gambling may be legalized, but everything that comes with it is not. And that’s the case against it. A case for the corroboration of gambling is largely two, maybe three-fold, since these are Native American establishments being careful. First, gambling on this scale is a development tool. For example, the proposed Hardeeville casino and its associated resort would bring jobs and some tax revenue to an area that is among the most hard-pressed in the state.

That case is a little less significant with the York County plan, but it’s there all the same. Secondly, there is the anti-prohibition argument which argues it’s easier to offer some legal release for certain urges than it is to keep track of all the illegal outlets. Finally, casinos do provide a sort of conscience-assuaging recompense payment to Native Americans.

These people were not well treated during the expansive phase of American history in the 19th and early 20th centuries, and their ability to flourish on their own lands is now sharply synchronized by the federal government. We lay all this out because we’re not sure just what to make of the current casino talk.

For Casino games,casinos list, Casino Guide, gambling games, casino cartoons etc…………….more details visit bestcasinosreview.com